Real Estate Ownership in a self-directed Investment Retirement Account; avoiding the hidden risks

Law Office News

Written by

admin@vernitax

Published on

July 2, 2020

Real estate ownership in a Self-Directed Investment Retirement Account (IRA) can provide certain tax benefits to taxpayers who are considering an investment in real estate. However, a retirement account considering such a strategy should be familiar with IRS rules and potential tax consequences associated with violating those rules.

A self-directed IRA can provide a taxpayer with the ability to control his or her real estate assets as well as an “above the line” deduction for income tax purposes. In addition, any income generated from the property as well as the gain from its sale is deferred until such time as the investment is withdrawn.

Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code

The IRS rules against self-dealing and conflicts of interest (“Prohibited Transaction”) are contained in Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code and can result in significant financial consequences to the investor.

The term “Prohibited Transaction” refers to the direct or indirect:

  • sale, lease or exchange of property between a plan and a disqualified person;
  • a loan or any extension of credit between a plan and a disqualified person;
  • furnishing of goods, services or facilities between a plan and a disqualified person;
  • transfer or use of the income or assets of a plan to a disqualified person (including using the assets indirectly for the benefit of that person);
  • act by a disqualified person who is a fiduciary whereby he deals with the income or assets of a plan in his own interest or for his own account; and
  • receipt of any consideration for his own personal account by any disqualified person who is a fiduciary from any party dealing with the plan in connection with a transaction involving the income or assets of the plan.

Entering into a Prohibited Transaction, even if the amount is insignificant, can trigger a taxable event resulting in tax, penalties and interest. The rules also apply without regard to the form of ownership. Accordingly, the IRA holding real estate in an investment company or a limited liability company does not guarantee that the transaction will not be considered “Prohibited.” Some examples of Prohibited Transactions include: the escrow of sales proceeds with someone other than an IRA Custodian, using real estate held in an IRA in order to pay off personal debt, or doing repairs or routine maintenance (such as painting on the property).

Furthermore, where the IRA invests in real estate other than for investment purposes, the taxpayer may be subject to Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT).  An example would be an IRA that is routinely engaged in flipping properties. In this regard, real estate held in a retirement account would be considered inventory rather than an investment in real estate. UBIT could also be triggered if a retirement account acquires an interest in an operating business that is engaged in the purchase and sale of goods.

If you are considering a real estate ownership in a retirement account or your retirement account currently owns real property, and the IRA has decided to sell and acquire a replacement property, you should consult with an experienced and knowledgeable tax attorney prior to taking any action.

Author

Anthony N. Verni

ATTORNEY AT LAW, J.D., CPA, MBA
With 20+ years of experience practicing before the IRS, I bring a rare combination of legal and financial expertise as both an Attorney and a Certified Public Accountant.

Why Trust Us

At your company name here, we adhere to a stringent editorial policy emphasizing factual accuracy, impartiality and relevance. Our content, curated by experienced industry professionals. A team of experienced editors reviews this content to ensure it meets the highest standards in reporting and publishing.

More Similar Posts

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

Table of contents

Hear from relieved
Taxpayers who trusted Verni Tax Law

Anthony was creative in helping me resolve some past issues in a way that they never became a problem so that is greatly appreciated and I feel confident I can now enjoy my retirement with peace of mind. Thanks for that.

Ken B.

Cebu City, Philippines

Anthony was creative in helping me resolve some past issues in a way that they never became a problem so that is greatly appreciated and I feel confident I can now enjoy my retirement with peace of mind. Thanks for that.

Douglas R.

Osaka, Japan

Anthony was creative in helping me resolve some past issues in a way that they never became a problem so that is greatly appreciated and I feel confident I can now enjoy my retirement with peace of mind. Thanks for that.

Phil Y

President, Swift & Secure Systems Inc., Boynton Beach, FL

Anthony was creative in helping me resolve some past issues in a way that they never became a problem so that is greatly appreciated and I feel confident I can now enjoy my retirement with peace of mind. Thanks for that.

Yassin and Eva, B.

President, Swift & Secure Systems Inc., Boynton Beach, FL

Have questions or need guidance?

I’m always available by phone, email, or Skype whatever’s easiest for you.

Take the first step and let me help fix the root of your tax problems.