Every few years, a new law comes along that quietly changes how everyday life works, not through loud headlines but through the small details hidden in its pages. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), passed in mid-2025, is one of those laws. It reaches into almost everything from immigration and border control to taxes and public benefits, shaping how people live, work, and even send money home.
If you’ve been hearing about it and wondering what it actually means, you’re not alone. This law is far from simple. It’s a wide mix of new rules, fees, and funding that affect both individuals and families in very real ways. From higher application costs to tighter enforcement and new taxes on remittances, the One Big Beautiful Bill immigration provisions are already setting new rules that reach deep into how people move, work, and stay in the U.S.
This blog walks you through those immigration provisions in clear, simple terms, what’s changing, who it affects, and why it matters more than most people realize.
What Is the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)?
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which you’ll often hear called OBBBA and also titled as H.R. 1 immigration enforcement, became law on July 4, 2025. Basically, it’s a really big and important law that makes changes in a bunch of key areas like taxes, government spending, and immigration. It’s the kind of law that touches a lot of things people care about and affects how things work for many Americans.
Now, this law doesn’t just do one thing; it does quite a few. It makes some tax rules permanent that were only temporary before, shifts around deductions a bit, and boosts funding for immigration enforcement and border security. At the same time, it reduces spending on some health programs. So, it’s a wide-reaching law with a lot packed into it, and its impact is going to be felt in different ways by a lot of people.
How was the Bill Passed Through Reconciliation?
The bill made it through Congress using the immigration budget reconciliation process. This process is a way to pass certain types of legislation with just a simple majority in the Senate, instead of needing the usual 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. What this means is that they were able to move the bill forward quickly, without the usual back-and-forth roadblocks.
Here’s how it went down:
- The House passed the bill on May 22, 2025. It was a close vote, 215-214, showing just how contentious the process was.
- Then, the Senate took it up, and on July 1, 2025, it passed with a 51-50 vote.
- Finally, after some back-and-forth, the House agreed to the Senate version on July 3, 2025, with a 218-214 vote, and the President signed the bill into law on July 4, 2025.
Key Dates and Implementation Timeline
Let’s break down the important dates so you can keep track:
- May 22, 2025: This is when the House of Representatives passed the bill. It was a tight vote, but it moved forward.
- July 1, 2025: The Senate gave its approval, and from there, it was just a matter of ironing out the final details.
- July 3, 2025: After some back and forth, the House agreed to the Senate’s changes, and that pretty much sealed the deal.
- July 4, 2025: The President signed the bill into law, officially making it part of the U.S. legal framework.
- October 2026 and beyond: Some provisions will kick in a little later, like the new immigration fees and changes to public benefits, which will start in October 2026.
| Note: While some provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act took effect immediately after the law was signed on July 4, 2025, many other parts have staggered start dates spanning several years. For example, certain tax reforms and credits began impacting taxpayers right away in 2025. Meanwhile, new immigration fees and changes to public benefits like Medicaid and SNAP are scheduled to begin in October 2026. Beyond that, provisions related to health programs, student loans, and other areas won’t be implemented until as late as 2028 or even later. So, the law’s full range of changes will gradually roll out over time, rather than all at once. |
Border Security Funding Under One Big Beautiful Bill: Immigration Provisions
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act provides a huge boost in funding for border security. And while these investments are primarily aimed at enhancing enforcement, they also signal a shift that could affect tax, immigration, and compliance processes. Whether you’re handling visa applications, cross‑border business, or concerned about compliance with immigration rules, these changes are something you’ll want to pay attention to.
Physical Border Wall and Infrastructure Investment
A big part of the funding is going toward border infrastructure, including physical barriers and new technology. This is a multi‑year effort to strengthen the physical presence of U.S. border security. Here’s what the bill is funding:
- The bill allocates $46.55 billion for the construction, installation, and improvement of physical barriers, roads, and infrastructure. This includes a significant focus on the primary and secondary walls, river barriers, and other protective structures along both the southern and northern U.S. borders. The White House’s summary indicates that the bill would fund the construction of 701 miles of primary wall, 900 miles of river barriers, 629 miles of secondary barriers, and 141 miles of vehicle and pedestrian barriers.
- Additionally, $5 billion is allocated for building and improving U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) facilities. This includes short‑term detention centers and checkpoints located along the borders.
- With $6.2 billion dedicated to technology, this investment includes new non‑intrusive inspection equipment, biometric systems, and other cutting‑edge tools designed to combat illicit trafficking. This also includes the setup of the biometric entry and exit system.
These investments represent a massive effort to fortify U.S. borders. For anyone involved in immigration matters or cross‑border activities, this means stronger enforcement measures and possibly more thorough inspections.
Border Patrol Agent Hiring and Training
In addition to physical infrastructure, the bill also focuses on the hiring, training, and retention of Border Patrol agents. This is about developing the human resources required to implement the new enforcement strategies. It is not enough to simply increase the number of personnel; they must also be given the tools and training they require to deal with the growing complexity of border security. Here’s what the funds support:
- $4.1 billion is allocated for the hiring and training of Border Patrol agents and support personnel. This will help expand the operational capacity of CBP, ensuring they have enough trained staff to manage the added infrastructure and security operations.
- The bill also provides over $2 billion in retention and hiring bonuses to help attract and keep skilled agents.
- For operational readiness, $855 million is earmarked for CBP vehicles and additional equipment.
With this funding, the government is increasing the number of agents on the ground, improving training, and providing the necessary tools to ensure effective enforcement. For those dealing with immigration or tax compliance issues, this means that border enforcement is becoming more comprehensive and efficient, leading to increased scrutiny and a more robust enforcement environment.
Immigration Detention and Deportation Funding
When the government changes how much it spends on immigration detention and deportation, it can have a big impact on everything from border immigration to compliance enforcement. If you’re working through immigration issues or involved in cross-border business, this new funding is something you’ll want to keep an eye on. Here’s how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act plans to shape the future of immigration detention and deportation:
Family Detention and Children’s Protections
The One Big Beautiful Bill allocates $45 billion to build and improve family detention centers and facilities for minors. This funding is aimed at expanding the U.S.’s capacity to detain families while their immigration cases are processed. Here’s what’s included in the family detention immigration law:
- $45 billion is earmarked for new family detention facilities and improvements to existing ones.
- The bill includes provisions to hold families in detention longer than previous laws allowed, potentially affecting the Flores Settlement, which once limited the length of time minors could be detained.
If you’re involved with immigration cases, especially those involving families or minors, expect these new detention rules to potentially impact how long people might be detained and the conditions they’ll face while waiting for their cases to be processed.
State Reimbursement Programs
The bill includes $12 billion in funding to reimburse state and local governments for their border security activities. This funding is meant to support local law enforcement agencies involved in immigration detention and enforcement. Here’s what it means:
- The $12 billion can be used to reimburse state, local, and tribal governments for their role in managing and securing the borders.
- It’s expected that local agencies may now take on more border security responsibilities, potentially increasing the local enforcement of immigration policies.
For people working in border regions or dealing with immigration issues at the local level, this funding means there will likely be more local scrutiny and immigration enforcement, something to keep in mind when managing immigration processes or related businesses.
New Immigration Fees and Application Costs Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Immigration Provisions
The new fees introduced by the bill will have a direct impact on those seeking asylum, work permits, and relief from removal. For many, these increased costs may create additional barriers in already complex immigration processes.
Asylum Application Fees and Annual Charges
The One Big Beautiful Bill imposes new fees for asylum applications and work authorization. Here’s a breakdown of the fees:
- A $100 fee to file an asylum application (Form I-589) for individuals seeking protection in the U.S.
- An additional $550 fee to apply for work authorization (Form I-765) while an asylum claim is still pending.
- A $275 renewal fee for work authorization.
- Annual asylum fees of at least $100 for those with pending asylum applications.
These fees will apply to anyone seeking asylum, and there are no waivers for these fees. These new charges are expected to create financial barriers for individuals seeking protection, as many of them are already in vulnerable situations and may struggle to afford these costs.
Temporary Protected Status Fee (TPS) Increases
The One Big Beautiful Bill imposes new fees for TPS applicants and those renewing their status. The fees are as follows:
- $500 fee to register for TPS (Form I-821)
- $550 fee for initial employment authorization for individuals with TPS.
- $275 fee for TPS renewal.
As with humanitarian parole, work authorization for individuals with TPS can be granted or renewed for a maximum of one year, or the length of the TPS grant, whichever is shorter. These new fees come with no fee waivers, meaning all applicants will need to pay these fees to maintain their TPS status.
These increases are likely to create financial burdens for individuals relying on TPS protections, especially for those who face economic challenges.
Humanitarian Parole Fees
The One Big Beautiful Bill introduces significant fees for individuals applying for humanitarian parole and work authorization. The new fees are as follows:
- A $1,000 fee to apply for humanitarian parole (Form I-131), which is typically used for travel or urgent entry requests.
- An additional $550 fee for initial work authorization for individuals granted humanitarian parole.
- A $275 renewal fee for work authorization.
Work authorization for humanitarian parole recipients can be granted and renewed for a maximum of one year or the validity of the parole grant, whichever is shorter. As with other immigration-related fees, there are no fee waivers for any of these applications.
These new fees will undoubtedly create financial barriers for those seeking humanitarian protection, especially for vulnerable individuals in urgent need of assistance.
Immigration Court Proceedings
The One Big Beautiful Bill introduces new fees for immigration court proceedings, including applications, motions, and appeals. Here’s what these fees include:
- Application fees for individuals applying for relief from removal or adjusting their status.
- Motion fees for requesting changes or reviews of immigration court decisions.
- Appeal fees for individuals seeking to appeal decisions made in immigration courts.
While these Immigration application fees increase the financial burden on those involved in immigration proceedings, there is a provision for fee waivers for individuals who can demonstrate financial hardship. This is important because it helps ensure that low-income individuals can still access the legal system.
Border and Visa Processing
The One Big Beautiful Bill creates a $5,000 apprehension fee that will be assessed against inadmissible aliens who are apprehended by CBP between ports of entry or individuals who are ordered removed in absentia. This means the fee will apply to individuals who are deported after being ordered to leave but were not present at their hearing.
Here’s what this entails:
- $5,000 fee for inadmissible aliens apprehended between ports of entry or ordered removed in absentia.
- This fee will apply primarily to individuals who attempt illegal crossings or are involved in enforcement actions related to immigration violations.
The introduction of this fee is likely to add financial strain to individuals who are already facing deportation or removal proceedings. It also signals increased costs related to enforcement for individuals apprehended at or near the U.S. border.
Healthcare and Public Benefit Restrictions
The One Big Beautiful Bill introduces significant changes to healthcare and public benefits, particularly for immigrants. If you’re dealing with the immigration system, it’s important to understand how these changes could affect access to critical services like healthcare, food assistance, and tax credits.
Medicaid and CHIP Eligibility Changes
Under the new law, there are restrictions on Medicaid and CHIP (Children’s Health Insurance Program) eligibility for immigrants who do not have verified citizenship or qualifying immigration status. Here’s what that means:
- Immigrants without citizenship or qualifying status will lose access to federal healthcare funding through Medicaid and CHIP.
- States will also see a reduction in federal matching funds, from 90% to 80% for certain healthcare services provided to immigrants.
This shift will make it harder for immigrants to get the health coverage they need, especially for those who don’t have full immigration status. Mixed-status families will feel the impact, with many losing healthcare access altogether.
Tax Credit Restrictions for Immigrant Families
The new bill imposes restrictions on tax credits for immigrant families, particularly around the Child Tax Credit and other benefits.
- To be eligible for the Child Tax Credit, families will now need Social Security Numbers (SSNs) for both parents, which are issued through the Social Security card application process (Form SS-5).
- As a result, over 4.5 million children, the majority of whom are U.S. citizens, will no longer qualify for these credits because one or both parents may not have an SSN.
This change is especially significant for families in California and Texas, where nearly 1 million children will be impacted. For many, these credits are crucial for managing day-to-day expenses, and the restrictions could place a financial strain on families already facing tough circumstances.
SNAP Food Assistance Limitations
Another major change in the bill is restricting access to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Here’s what’s happening:
- The bill limits SNAP eligibility to U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (LPRs) only.
- This change eliminates food assistance for many immigrants, even if they have legal status.
For many families, SNAP benefits are vital to ensure that everyone has access to healthy food. This restriction means that some families will face increased food insecurity, and it’s another challenge for mixed-status families trying to make ends meet.
Immigration Court System and Processing Changes
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act makes major changes to the immigration court system and the way immigration cases are handled. These changes are meant to speed up deportations and reduce immigrants’ access to legal protections, and they form an important part of the bill’s immigration provisions.
Expedited Removal Expansion
One key change is the expansion of expedited removal. This process allows the government to deport certain immigrants quickly without a full court hearing. Previously, expedited removal mostly applied to people caught near the border shortly after crossing. Now, the bill allows the deportation of immigrants with certain criminal or security issues, even if they have lived in the U.S. for a long time, without immigration court review. This means more individuals could be removed faster and with fewer legal safeguards.
Legal Representation and Court Capacity
At the same time, the bill limits access to legal help for immigrants facing deportation. It caps the number of immigration judges at 800 starting in 2028, which restricts the courts’ ability to handle cases quickly. This cap, combined with limited funding for legal services, means longer backlogs and fewer opportunities for immigrants to get counsel. Getting around the legal system becomes much more difficult, which can affect the fairness of removal proceedings.
Impact on Specific Visa Categories and Work Authorization
Getting through the visa rules and work authorizations can be tricky enough, but the new law shakes things up even more, especially for those on specialized work visas or seeking humanitarian protection. What’s happening here could change application costs, eligibility, and even how quickly cases get processed.
Remittance Tax and Economic Impact
If you or your family send money abroad, this part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is worth knowing about. The law introduces a new remittance tax, a small charge on money transfers sent outside the U.S., and it’s going to shape how people move money across borders and how that affects local economies.
What Does the Law Introduce?
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act adds a 1% excise tax on certain remittance transfers from the U.S. to other countries. In plain words, every time someone sends money home, a small portion will go to the government as tax.
Here’s how it works:
- Who pays?
The person sending the money doesn’t directly pay the tax; it’s collected by the money transfer service (like a bank or wire company) at the time of the transaction. - What is the effective date?
The rule kicks in for transfers made after December 31, 2025, so it effectively starts in 2026. - Where does it apply?
The tax targets transfers made for personal, family, or household purposes, not large business or corporate transactions. - What are the possible exemptions?
Transfers done through U.S.-regulated financial institutions or paid with U.S.-issued debit or credit cards may be exempt once final Treasury guidelines are released.
Why Does It Matter for Immigrant Families?
Remittances aren’t just money; they’re support systems. Millions of immigrants send funds every month to help loved ones back home with food, housing, school, and medical care.
This new tax means:
- Smaller amounts reach families. Even a 1% cut can add up for those sending frequent transfers.
- Higher overall costs. Fees plus taxes make each transaction more expensive.
- Shift to informal channels. Some may turn to unregulated ways of sending money, which can increase risks like scams or legal issues.
So while the policy aims to raise federal revenue, it could unintentionally make life tougher for the very families that rely on this flow of income.
The Broader Economic Ripple
The remittance tax doesn’t just touch senders; it affects two economies at once.
- In the U.S., the government expects billions in new revenue over the next decade, but banks and money services will face higher compliance costs to collect and report these taxes. For immigrant workers, that could mean rethinking how they manage and send savings.
- In other countries, Many developing nations depend heavily on U.S. remittances. For example, Mexico and El Salvador receive billions annually, money that supports small businesses and keeps local economies stable. Even a small dip in remittance flow could hit families and communities hard.
This shows how a tax written into a U.S. law can have a ripple effect far beyond American borders.
What It Means for You?
Whether you’re an individual, an advisor, or a business, the new rule changes how cross-border transfers will be viewed and tracked.
- For senders: Plan ahead for the extra cost and choose transfer services that might qualify for exemption.
- For tax and immigration professionals: Be ready to advise clients on how this tax applies to their immigration laws, especially for those with frequent remittance obligations.
- For financial institutions: Expect stricter reporting and verification processes once Treasury finalizes the implementation.
The remittance tax is small in percentage but big in impact. It ties immigration, finance, and global economics together in one clause of the bill. Over time, it’s expected to change how people send money abroad and how families both in the U.S. and overseas feel the weight of that change.
| FBAR & FATCA Compliance in Light of the New Remittance TaxIf you’re sending money abroad, the new 1% remittance tax under the One Big Beautiful Bill could affect more than just your wallet. If you have foreign bank accounts or assets, you might need to report them through FBAR (Foreign Bank Account Report) or FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act). These laws require U.S. taxpayers to disclose foreign accounts when the value exceeds certain thresholds. So, while the remittance tax adds a small fee, it also means extra paperwork and possible reporting if you’re holding funds abroad. |
State and Local Government Roles in Immigration Enforcement
When you zoom in on the immigration pieces of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, it’s not just about Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol. The law also pours money into states and local governments so they can plug into immigration enforcement more directly. It doesn’t rewrite the basic rules of who enforces immigration law, but it does create big funding streams that invite state and local agencies into that space.
Here’s how that actually works, based only on what’s in the law and official summaries.
How Does the Act Bring States and Localities Into Immigration Enforcement?
It’s not just the big federal agencies calling the shots anymore. Bit by bit, states and local governments are being pulled into the mix too, and that really changes how immigration rules play out on the ground, from local budgets to how everyday enforcement actually happens.
1. Direct support for state and local law enforcement
The border security title of the Act sets aside $17.3 billion specifically “to support state and local law enforcement with border enforcement.”
In plain terms, that’s federal money earmarked to help state and local police and sheriffs participate in activities related to border and immigration enforcement, alongside federal agencies like ICE and CBP.
2. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reimbursement fund for border-related costs
The Act also creates a large reimbursement pot for border-related spending:
- Congress allocated $10 billion for the Secretary of Homeland Security to reimburse costs incurred in activities that support DHS’s border-security mission.
- In a breakdown from the bill’s sponsor, this is paired with an additional program, bringing total reimbursement-style funding for states to about $13.5 billion (including the Department of Justice [DOJ] grants below).
- An immigration policy summary describes a related DHS program that provides around $12 billion to reimburse state, local, and tribal governments for border enforcement activities.
So, if a state has been spending its own budget on border operations (troopers, wall segments, migrant transport, etc.), this law gives DHS and DOJ money to help pay those states back.
3. DOJ grants for state and local immigration-enforcement activities
On top of the DHS money, the Act creates a dedicated Department of Justice grant program for state and local governments:
- $3.5 billion is authorized for DOJ to issue grants to state and local governments for immigration enforcement activities dating back to January 20, 2021.
According to the statutory summary and the sponsor’s own explanation, eligible uses for these grants include:
- Locating and arresting people who are in the U.S. without authorization or who have committed crimes.
- Investigating gang or other criminal activity linked to non-citizens.
- Prosecuting crimes committed by immigrants, as well as drug- and human-trafficking cases.
- Running court operations related to those prosecutions.
- Temporarily detaining immigrants who are facing criminal charges.
- Transporting people who are in the country without authorization or who have committed crimes.
- Covering vehicle, logistics, and other support costs for these operations.
So this isn’t just “here’s some general money for your budget.” It’s specifically structured around immigration enforcement tasks that state and local agencies carry out.
4. Homeland security grant programs tied to border and joint operations
The Act also boosts existing homeland security programs that connect local governments to federal enforcement:
- It provides $10 billion in grants to reimburse states for prior border security efforts, according to a detailed local-government analysis.
- It adds $450 million to the Operation Stonegarden program, which is explicitly designed to support partnerships between local law enforcement agencies and U.S. Border Patrol in border-region jurisdictions.
- The same analysis notes additional funding for state and local homeland-security efforts, like
All of that sits on top of the broader $170 billion border security package and massive increases to ICE funding in the Act.
What does This Actually Mean for States and Localities?
Putting it all together, the law does a few very specific things for state and local governments:
- Gives them large, dedicated funding streams: States and localities can now tap:
- Border-support money targeted at state and local law enforcement,
- DHS reimbursement funds for past or ongoing border-related spending, and
- DOJ grants for concrete immigration-enforcement activities (arrests, investigations, prosecutions, detention, and transport).
- Aligns local policing and courts more closely with federal immigration priorities: Because the DOJ grants can be used for investigations, court operations, and temporary detention tied to immigrants and trafficking cases, local police departments, prosecutors, and jail systems become more tightly connected to the federal deportation and enforcement pipeline.
- Expands joint operations and coordination with DHS/Border Patrol: Programs like Operation Stonegarden and the new homeland-security grants are meant to strengthen partnerships between local law enforcement and federal border agencies, especially in border regions and major host cities.
A national local-government group notes that, alongside these grants, the Act’s big investment in federal immigration officers and bonuses will “significantly expand federal immigration enforcement capacity,” which may lead to more enforcement activity in cities and require local governments to manage coordination and community impacts.
Long-Term Implications and Future Outlook for the One Big Beautiful Bill Immigration Provisions
Now that we’ve seen what the OBBBA changes in the short term in border security, detention, remittance tax, and benefit access, it’s time to look ahead.
Several policy institutes, advocacy groups, and research organizations have analyzed what these provisions could mean over the next decade. This section draws entirely from their published findings and projections, not speculation.
1. Expansion of Detention and Deportation Capacity
Analysts from the Migration Policy Institute and the American Immigration Council note that the Act’s historic $45 billion investment in detention facilities and increased ICE staffing could lead to record detention levels and a sharp rise in removals for years to come.
- The infrastructure funded under OBBBA, new family centers, expanded detention beds, and upgraded transport logistics give ICE the capacity to detain up to one million people per year, according to early policy modeling.
- Researchers warn that once such capacity exists, it tends to become permanent policy infrastructure, shaping future immigration enforcement even beyond this administration.
2. Shrinking Humanitarian Pathways
According to Global Refuge and the Rockefeller Institute’s policy brief, the Act’s new fees on asylum, humanitarian parole, and TPS are expected to discourage applications and narrow humanitarian access.
- Over the long term, these costs could reduce legal migration routes, forcing more people into irregular channels.
- Policy experts argue that higher barriers to asylum often lead to increased Immigration court backlogs rather than fewer arrivals, as cases take longer to process and appeals multiply.
3. Economic and Remittance-Flow Consequences
Research from the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), the Niskanen Center, and financial analyses in the Wall Street Journal show that the 1 percent remittance tax will have measurable effects on both U.S. households and foreign economies.
- Over time, the tax could reduce formal remittance flows to key partner nations such as Mexico, India, and the Philippines by billions of dollars annually.
- Economists warn this may increase reliance on informal transfer channels, which are harder to regulate and more vulnerable to fraud.
- Domestically, reduced disposable income for immigrant families could lower consumer spending and slow local economic activity in communities that rely on migrant labor.
4. Impact on Immigrant Families and U.S.-Citizen Children
The National Immigration Law Center (NILC) and League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) emphasize that the Act’s restrictions on Medicaid, SNAP, and the Child Tax Credit will reverberate for years within mixed-status families.
- Analysts estimate that roughly 4.5 million U.S.-citizen children could lose eligibility for child-related credits because one or both parents lack a SSN.
- Over the long term, that loss of benefits could increase child poverty rates and reduce educational and health outcomes in immigrant-heavy regions.
- Experts frame this as a “generational setback,” where current restrictions translate into wider socioeconomic gaps later.
5. Policy Outlook and Structural Shift
Across think-tank commentary, from the Rockefeller Institute, American Immigration Council, and National League of Cities, one theme repeats: the OBBBA represents a permanent policy shift toward enforcement-led immigration governance.
- With multi-year funding already locked in, future administrations would need new legislation to reverse these allocations.
- Experts anticipate that immigration debates will increasingly focus on management and detention capacity, rather than integration or legalization measures.
- Local governments, meanwhile, may face ongoing fiscal strain as federal reimbursement programs phase down, but enforcement responsibilities remain.
6. The Broader Picture
Put simply, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act lays the groundwork for an immigration system that is more expensive, more centralized, and more enforcement-driven.
Every major research body agrees on one point: its effects will extend well beyond the current budget window. What begins as a funding and policy package in 2025 is likely to reshape immigration enforcement, humanitarian access, and immigrant family economics through the next decade and beyond.
Turn Complex Policy Into Practical Guidance with Verni Tax Law!
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act doesn’t just change immigration; it also reshapes how people, families, and even small businesses interact with the law. From new remittance taxes to higher fees and tighter enforcement, it connects immigration and financial compliance more closely than before. And for anyone who lives, works, or sends money across borders, these changes are going to matter in very real ways.
Verni Tax Law understands this intersection better than most. Anthony N. Verni, a licensed attorney and Certified Public Accountant (CPA) with over 25 years of experience, has spent his career helping individuals, families, and businesses deal with complex IRS and federal compliance issues. He’s handled everything from domestic disputes to international tax matters, and he knows how to bring clarity when the rules start to overlap.If the new law has left you unsure about where you stand or how it could affect your tax or compliance obligations, it’s always better to review things early. A short, confidential conversation with Verni Tax Law can help you see what’s changing, what to prepare for, and what steps can keep you protected going forward.
FAQ’s
Q1: Can asylum seekers get fee waivers under the One Big Beautiful Bill?
No, they can’t. The new law clearly says the asylum fees must be paid by everyone.
Here’s what that looks like:
- A $100 fee when you first file your asylum application.
- Another $100 every year while your case is still pending.
These fees apply to all applicants, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) won’t accept fee waiver requests for them. Even if you have a low income, you’ll still need to pay what’s required under the new rules.
Q2: Will the Visa Integrity Fee be refunded and how do I claim it?
Technically, yes, but not right now. The Visa Integrity Fee was meant to be refundable if you follow your visa rules and leave the country on time.
The problem is, there’s no official refund process yet. The government hasn’t released any form or instructions for it. So, for now, it’s safer to assume you won’t get the $250 back unless they later create a system for refunds.
Once that process is announced, you’ll probably need to prove that you followed every condition of your visa before asking for a refund.
Q3: How does OBBBA affect pending immigration applications filed before July 2025?
If you filed your immigration application before July 2025, don’t worry, it’s still valid.
However, some parts of the new law now apply to your case going forward.
Here’s how it works:
- You’ll keep the old filing fee for the application you already submitted.
- But any new steps, like renewing your work permit or paying the new yearly asylum charge, will now follow the new OBBBA fees and rules.
In short, your old filing stays safe, but anything you do after July 2025 will be governed by the new law.
Q4: Can U.S. citizen children still receive Medicaid if parents are undocumented under the new law?
Yes, they can. U.S. citizen children are still eligible for Medicaid and CHIP based on their own citizenship and household income.
The main change is that OBBBA adds stricter checks and reduced funding, which might make it harder for families to apply for or renew coverage. Some parents might also feel hesitant to apply because of their own status.
So, even though the rule hasn’t changed, the process could become tougher for mixed-status families to manage.
Q5: What happens to TPS holders whose work permits expire before they can afford the new renewal fees?
If your TPS work permit expires and you haven’t renewed it with the new fee, your right to work ends on the expiry date.
Here’s what the new law says:
- You must pay $500 for TPS registration and $275 for each work permit renewal.
- There are no fee waivers for these payments.
- You’ll still have TPS protection from deportation, but you can’t work legally until you renew your work permit.
It’s a good idea to renew early and look for help from nonprofit or community groups that assist with immigration fees so you don’t lose your ability to work.








