By Anthony N. Verni, Attorney at Law, CPA
Series: International Tax Reform 2025 – Part 6 of 6
Why Cross-Border Debt Matters Again
Debt has long been the preferred vehicle for profit repatriation—interest is deductible, dividends are not. Post-BEPS, that advantage is narrowing fast. Both the United States and the OECD have imposed strict interest-limitation and anti-hybrid measures that restrict deductions and re-characterize payments. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) of 2025 kept the core of §163(j) but tightened its reach, reflecting global pressure to curb earnings stripping.
Section 163(j): The U.S. Interest-Limitation Rule
Current Rule (2025): A taxpayer’s business-interest deduction is limited to the sum of 30% of adjusted taxable income (ATI) plus business-interest income and floor-plan financing interest. OBBBA Modifications Effective 2026: ATI no longer adds back depreciation, amortization, or depletion (making the cap tighter). Group-consolidation elections were simplified, and disallowed interest now carries forward indefinitely without carryback.
Practice Insight:
Multinationals with intercompany loans should model 2026 interest limits under the new ATI definition. The loss of EBITDA add-back alone can reduce available deductions by 10–20%.
Earnings-Stripping and Debt-to-Equity Concerns
Even before §163(j), the IRS challenged “thin capitalization” structures under §385 and judicial doctrine (e.g., Fin Hay Realty Co., 398 F.2d 694 (3d Cir. 1968)). The OBBBA reinforces documentation requirements for related-party loans: written instrument, reasonable expectation of repayment, and arm’s-length interest rate.
Practice Insight:
Hybrid rules don’t require intent to avoid tax or perform tax fraud. Even routine treasury center loans through Luxembourg or Ireland can trigger §267A if the instrument is treated differently abroad.
Interaction with Foreign Tax Credit Planning
Interest allocation under §861 directly affects the foreign tax credit (FTC) limitation. The 2025 reforms allow partial re-sourcing of related-party interest to U.S. income for groups with significant domestic operations, restoring some FTC capacity.
Inbound Financing and Earnings-Stripping Risk
Foreign-parented U.S. subsidiaries remain under heavy IRS scrutiny. LB&I’s Inbound Debt Campaign targets situations where U.S. entities carry excessive debt relative to EBITDA and pay interest to related foreign creditors in low-tax countries. Risk indicators include debt-to-equity ratios above 3:1, floating rates without commercial justification, and a lack of third-party comparables.
Outbound Financing and Cash-Pooling Structures
U.S. multinationals using foreign subsidiaries as treasury centers must consider local withholding tax, hybrid entity mismatches, and GILTI/Subpart F exposure. Cash-pooling arrangements can trigger CFC inclusions if the foreign pool lends to a related U.S. entity.
Practice Insight:
Review treasury agreements annually. A “cash-pool” that functions as a deposit can generate Subpart F interest income and invalidate high-tax exclusion claims.
Documentation and Contemporaneous Evidence
To support deductibility under §§163(j), 267A, and 385, maintain loan agreements, evidence of repayment capacity, transfer-pricing analyses, and board approvals. The IRS expects documentation consistent with OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2022) and IRM 4.61.9 – Intercompany Financing.
Global Trends and Pillar Two Interaction
Under Pillar Two, excess interest deductions reduce jurisdictional ETRs, increasing exposure to top-up taxes. Foreign countries are tightening thin-cap rules (e.g., 30% EBITDA caps in the EU Directive 2016/1164 and U.K. Corporate Interest Restriction). Multinationals must model cross-border financing rules holistically; interest limits in one jurisdiction can create minimum-tax liabilities in another.
Strategic Checklist for Attorneys and CPAs
✓ Model §163(j) capacity for each entity post-EBITDA redefinition
✓ Review hybrid instruments for §267A exposure
✓ Confirm debt vs. equity classification under §385
✓ Reconcile interest allocations with FTC baskets
✓ Update intercompany loan policies and TP files
✓ Test treasury center activities for Subpart F implications
✓ Align cross-border financing rules with Pillar Two ETR modelling
Key Authorities and Resources
- IRC §163(j): Business-interest limitation
- IRC §267A: Hybrid mismatch arrangements
- IRC §385: Debt vs. equity classification
- Treas. Reg. §§1.163(j)-1 et seq.
- OECD BEPS Action 2 (hybrids) & Action 4 (interest limits)
- EU ATAD I (2016/1164)
- IRM 4.61.9: Intercompany Financing
Conclusion
The 2025 reforms mark a turning point for cross-border finance. Where multinationals once relied on intra-group loans to optimize global ETRs, today’s hybrid and interest-limitation rules demand substance, documentation, and coordination. Attorneys and CPAs must now treat capital structure as a compliance issue—bridging transfer pricing, foreign tax credits, and Pillar Two modeling.
