Can You Go to Prison for Tax Evasion? Penalties Explained

Latest Facts & News

  • IRS prosecution rates: The IRS secures convictions in nearly 90% of criminal tax cases, with recent high-profile sentences ranging from several years to decades for large-scale fraud.
  • Maximum penalties: Individuals can face up to 5 years in federal prison per count of tax evasion, with fines up to $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for corporations.
  • Stacked charges: Multiple charges (fraud, conspiracy, mail/wire fraud) can result in sentences exceeding 20 years.
  • Civil vs. criminal: Most tax issues result in civil penalties, but willful tax evasion or fraud can lead to criminal prosecution and jail time.
  • International context: In Canada, tax evasion can result in up to 5 years in jail and fines up to 200% of the taxes evaded.

When most people think about tax evasion, they picture dramatic headlines or famous scandals. But the reality is that tax evasion is a problem that can touch anyone from business owners and professionals to everyday workers, often in ways you might not expect. The rules are strict, the penalties are real, and the IRS is paying closer attention than ever. 

In this guide, you’ll find out what actually counts as tax evasion, who really faces tax fraud jail time, and how the IRS decides which cases to pursue. You’ll also see what happens when things go wrong, and most importantly, how you can stay safe, avoid costly mistakes, and protect your future.

Let’s get started and find an answer to, “Can you go to prison for tax evasion?”

Understanding Tax Evasion

Tax evasion is the illegal act of deliberately avoiding tax payments by hiding income, falsifying records, or underreporting earnings. It’s a criminal offense that harms the economy and burdens honest taxpayers. 

What Qualifies as Tax Evasion?

Tax evasion occurs when an individual deliberately misrepresents their financial situation to avoid paying taxes. It’s not a mistake; it’s fraud. 

Common examples include →

  • Hiding income: Not reporting cash earnings or offshore bank accounts.
  • Faking expenses: Claiming personal vacations as business trips or inventing deductions.
  • Forging records: Using fake receipts or keeping two sets of books to hide profits.
  • Smuggling goods: Avoiding customs duties by sneaking items across borders.
  • Illegal schemes: Creating sham charities to claim false donations.

Real-World Cases: How Tax Evasion Happens

To make it even more straightforward, here are real cases where people crossed the line and faced severe consequences:

  1. Business owner hides assets: Brandon Aumiller, an insurance business owner in Pennsylvania, was sentenced to 2 years in prison for hiding money and lying to the IRS. He used other people’s bank accounts and secret deals to avoid paying $478,270 in taxes. He now has to pay back the money and has a felony record.
  2. Celebrity fails to file returns: Actor Wesley Snipes didn’t file his tax returns for six years and avoided about $7 million in taxes. He was sentenced to three years in prison and was required to repay his debt.
  3. Mobster’s downfall: Al Capone, the famous gangster, went to prison for tax evasion after not reporting millions in illegal income. He received a ten-year prison sentence and substantial fines.
  4. Hotel owner cheats on taxes: Leona Helmsley, a hotel owner, charged personal expenses to her business to dodge taxes. She was sentenced to four years in prison and had to pay over $7 million in fines.

These cases demonstrate that tax evasion can affect anyone, from business owners to celebrities to notorious criminals. The common thread is the intentional act of hiding money or providing false information to the tax authorities.

Civil vs. Criminal Tax Evasion Penalties

The IRS treats tax evasion as either a civil (non-willful errors) or a criminal (willful fraud) offense. Here’s the difference: 

Aspect Civil Tax Penalties Criminal Tax Penalties
What Triggers It Mistakes, negligence, late filing, underpayment without intent Willful fraud, intentional hiding of income, falsifying records, or lying to tax authorities
Prison Time None Yes, up to 5 years per charge (U.S.), 6 months to 7 years (India)
Fines (Individuals) 1. Late filing: 5% of unpaid tax/month (max 25%)

2. Late payment: 0.5%/month (max 25%)

3. Underreporting: 20% (unintentional), 75% (fraud)

4. Failure to file information returns: $340/return

5. Hiding assets: up to 200% of evaded tax (India)

 1. Up to $100,000 (U.S.)

2. Up to $500,000 (corporations, U.S.)
Other Penalties Interest on unpaid taxes Restitution, property seizure, criminal record, and possible passport revocation
Evidence Needed “Clear and convincing” proof of error or negligence “Beyond a reasonable doubt” of intentional fraud
Impact on Record No criminal record Permanent criminal record (affects jobs, travel, loans)
Example Accidentally underreporting $10,000 = $2,000 penalty (20%) + interest Hiding $500,000 in income = 2+ years in prison + $100,000+ fine

Note:

  • Most tax issues are civil and result in fines, not jail.
  • Criminal tax penalties are only for intentional tax evasion or fraud.
  • Always report income honestly and seek professional advice if unsure.

Tax Evasion Punishment: What Are the Legal Consequences?

If you are caught evading taxes in the United States, the law treats it as a serious crime. The tax evasion punishment can include prison, hefty fines, and other penalties that can impact your life for years.

Prison Sentences for Tax Evasion

Tax evasion is a felony. If you are found guilty, you can go to federal prison.

  • Maximum prison time: Up to 5 years for each count of tax evasion.
  • Multiple charges: If you are convicted of several tax crimes, sentences can be added together, leading to even more years in prison.
  • How it works: The court must prove you acted intentionally to avoid paying taxes. Honest mistakes or simple negligence typically do not result in jail time.

Fines and Financial Penalties

Tax evasion also carries substantial fines and additional costs.

    • Fines for individuals: Up to $100,000 for each felony count.
    • Fines for corporations: Up to $500,000 per count.
    • Civil penalties: If the IRS finds you underpaid taxes due to fraud, you can face a civil penalty of 75% of the unpaid tax.
  • Other penalties:
    • Failure to file: 5% of unpaid tax per month, up to 25%.
    • Failure to pay: 0.5% per month, up to 25%.
    • Accuracy-related penalty: 20% of the underpayment if due to negligence.
  • Restitution: You must pay back all taxes owed, plus interest and penalties.

Additional Consequences

The tax evasion punishment goes beyond prison and fines.

  • Probation: Sometimes, the court may order probation instead of, or after, jail. You must follow strict rules, and breaking them can result in your return to prison.
  • Restitution: Courts can order you to pay back all taxes, interest, and penalties.
  • Criminal record: Tax evasion is a felony and stays on your record for life. This can make it hard to get a job, a loan, or even a passport.
  • Tax liens and asset seizure: The IRS can put a lien on your property or seize your assets, including your house, car, or bank accounts, to collect unpaid taxes.
  • Loss of passport: If you owe a significant amount in back taxes, your passport can be revoked or denied renewal.
  • Loss of Social Security benefits: The IRS can take part of your Social Security payments to cover back taxes.
  • Credit impact: While tax liens are not on credit reports, they are public records and can make it hard to get loans.

Who Goes to Prison for Tax Evasion?

Most people worry about going to jail if they make a mistake on their taxes, but the truth is that very few people actually go to prison for tax evasion. The IRS focuses on the most serious cases, where someone clearly and intentionally tried to cheat the system.

You are most at risk of prison for tax evasion if you:

  • Willfully and repeatedly cheat on your taxes. This means you knew what you were doing was wrong, and you did it anyway, often over several years.
  • Owe a large amount of money. The larger the tax loss, the more likely the IRS is to pursue criminal charges.
  • Lie or hide information during an audit. If you make false statements, hide bank accounts, or destroy records, the IRS sees this as a “badge of fraud.”
  • Show a clear pattern of fraud. If you have a history of underreporting income, claiming false deductions, or failing to file returns, this pattern increases the likelihood of prosecution.

Very few people go to prison for tax evasion.
For example, last year, the IRS Criminal Investigation division convicted 1,571 people for serious tax crimes, but only 615 of them were sentenced to prison, with an average sentence of 27 months. This indicates that, while the IRS takes fraud seriously, not every conviction results in jail time. Many cases result in fines, probation, or other penalties, especially if the scam wasn’t significant or intentional.

IRS Prosecution Priorities and Patterns

The IRS does not treat all tax issues the same. It focuses its criminal investigations, IRS audits, and prosecutions on certain types of cases and taxpayer behaviours. Here’s what the IRS is targeting right now:

  1. High-Income Individuals and Businesses: The IRS is allocating more resources to auditing and prosecuting individuals and businesses with high incomes who underreport earnings, fail to file returns, or conceal assets in offshore accounts.
  2. Corporations and Partnerships: Large corporations and partnerships are under increased scrutiny for complex tax filings and aggressive tax strategies.
  3. Digital Currency and Crypto Transactions: As more people use cryptocurrency, the IRS is prioritizing digital currency compliance. They are tracking cryptocurrency transactions and targeting individuals who fail to report gains or attempt to conceal assets using digital currencies.
  4. Employment Tax Enforcement: The IRS is cracking down on businesses that collect unpaid employment tax but fail to remit those taxes to the government.
  5. Abusive Tax Schemes and Credits: The IRS is targeting fraudulent tax credits (like the Fuel Tax Credit) and abusive tax shelters, including syndicated conservation easements and other complex scams. 

Patterns in IRS Prosecution

The IRS tends to prosecute tax cases that show clear and intentional wrongdoing. Here are the main patterns seen in the cases they bring to court:

  • They focus on individuals who use complex schemes to conceal money or evade taxes over several years.
  • They are more likely to prosecute cases where a lot of tax money is missing.
  • They often target business owners who fail to remit payroll taxes to the IRS.
  • They pay special attention to people who hide income using cryptocurrency or other digital assets.
  • They scrutinize closely anyone whose bank activity appears unusual or suspicious.
  • They require offenders to pay back taxes and sometimes seize property connected to the tax crime.

Factors That Influence Sentencing

Judges consider these key elements when deciding prison terms:

Factor Impact on Sentence
Tax loss amount <$100K: Often probation

$100K-$500K: 18-24 months

>$500K: 3+ years
Willful intent Deliberate fraud (e.g., forged documents) vs. negligence. Intent drastically increases sentences.
Cooperation Self-disclosure before an audit reduces penalties. Fighting investigations increases jail risk.
Criminal history First offenders: Lower sentences

Repeat tax fraud: 2×+ sentencing guidelines.
Role in the scheme Organizers (e.g., tax shelter promoters) get 20+ years. Participants get shorter terms.

After everything we’ve covered about what actions, patterns, and risks can lead to serious trouble with the IRS, it’s time to answer the question most readers have in mind:

Can You Go to Prison for Tax Evasion?

So, yes, after learning about everything that can lead to serious IRS trouble, like hiding income, lying on tax returns, or committing fraud, it’s clear that you can go to prison for tax evasion if you intentionally break tax laws. The IRS sends people to jail for these actions, not for honest mistakes or simply being unable to pay. 

Most people who end up in prison for tax evasion have committed serious or repeated fraud, and the maximum prison sentence can be up to five years for each count.

How to Avoid Tax Evasion Penalties and Punishment?

Avoiding tax evasion penalties begins with understanding your responsibilities and taking straightforward, informed steps to stay compliant with the law. Here’s how you can protect yourself:

Voluntary Disclosure and Compliance Programs

If you realize you made a mistake or forgot to report some income, the IRS gives you a chance to come forward before they contact you. Using these programs can help you avoid criminal charges and lower your penalties:

  • IRS Voluntary Disclosure Practice: If you report hidden income or mistakes before the IRS finds them, you may avoid prosecution if you fully cooperate and pay what you owe.
  • Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures: If you didn’t report foreign accounts or income, but it wasn’t on purpose, you can fix this with fewer penalties.
  • Offer in Compromise: If you can’t pay your full tax bill, you might be able to settle for less than you owe.
  • Installment Agreements: You can set up monthly payments with the IRS if you can’t pay all at once.

If you want help deciding which IRS program is right for you, our tax evasion attorney can guide you through your options and make the process easier. There are also other ways to resolve tax issues, so reaching out to a trusted tax professional is always a smart step.

Best Practices for Staying Compliant

The best way to avoid penalties is to be honest, organized, and proactive. Follow these steps:

  • Keep good records: Save all documents that show your income, expenses, and deductions. Digital tools can help you stay organized.
  • File on time: Always submit your tax returns by the deadline, even if you can’t pay the full amount right away.
  • Pay what you can: Pay as much as possible by the due date to reduce interest and late fees.
  • Report all income: Don’t leave out cash jobs, freelance work, or money from overseas.
  • Only claim real deductions: Make sure you qualify for any credits or deductions you claim. When in doubt, ask a tax expert.
  • Respond quickly to IRS letters: If the IRS contacts you, reply right away and give them any information they ask for.

Additional Tips

  • Stay updated: Tax laws change often. Check the IRS website or talk to a professional to stay informed.
  • Use official IRS resources: The IRS offers free guides and tools online to help you understand your tax duties.
  • Watch out for scams: Don’t trust anyone who promises to lower your taxes illegally or offers deals that seem too good to be true.

Recent High-Profile Tax Evasion Cases and Lessons Learned

These real cases from 2025 show how tax evasion leads to severe punishment and what you can learn to avoid the same mistakes:

  • Payroll Company Owner Used Employee Taxes for Himself
    A payroll services owner kept over $10 million in employee tax withholdings for personal use instead of paying the IRS. He was sentenced to federal prison.
    Lesson: Using business tax money for yourself is a crime and leads to jail.
  • Bookkeeper Lied on Taxes and Benefits
    A bookkeeper filed false tax returns and claimed disability benefits she didn’t deserve. She got more than a year in prison.
    Lesson: Lying on tax forms or claiming benefits will result in being caught and potentially sent to jail.
  • Man Faked Companies for Bigger Refunds
    A Houston man created fake companies and inflated wages on his tax returns for seven years to obtain larger refunds. He now faces up to three years in prison and must pay back the money.
    Lesson: Creating fake companies or income to get refunds is illegal and leads to prison and hefty repayments.
  • Tax Preparer Filed Hundreds of False Returns
    An Indiana tax preparer filed nearly 400 false returns for clients, causing considerable losses to the IRS. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison.
    Lesson: Tax professionals who cheat for clients risk jail, losing their business, and ruining their reputation.
  • Business Director Didn’t Pay Employment Taxes
    The director of an in-home care business failed to pay employment taxes for his staff. He was found guilty and faces up to 10 years in prison.
    Lesson: Failing to pay employment taxes is a serious offence with severe penalties.
  • Trio Ran a Multi-Million Dollar Check Fraud
    Three people were charged because they were running a $3.1 million check fraud scheme against the U.S. Treasury and others.
    Lesson: Large fraud schemes are quickly found and prosecuted, with long prison terms and hefty fines.

What You Should Learn →

  • Using business or payroll taxes for personal use is never safe.
  • Filing false returns, hiding income, or running fake companies will be caught and punished.
  • Tax professionals must always be honest; helping others cheat leads to prison.
  • All fraud, big or small, is risky and will likely be discovered.

Protect Yourself from Tax Evasion Risks with the Right Support

People facing tax evasion issues often feel stressed about audits, penalties, or even jail. The IRS takes tax fraud seriously, and the rules can be confusing; there are hundreds of pages of tax code, and even honest people can make mistakes or misunderstand what needs to be reported. With so many details and changes in the law, it’s easy to feel lost or worried about doing something wrong.

That’s why having the right help really matters. Antony Verni is both a tax attorney and a CPA with an MBA, so he understands how tax evasion cases work, from the legal steps to their financial implications and impact on your business. 

If you want honest answers and a clear path forward, contact Verni Tax Law to get the proper support for your tax situation and protect what matters most to you.

FAQs

  1. What is the difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance?

This is a common question about tax avoidance vs tax evasion.

Tax evasion refers to the act of breaking the law to avoid paying taxes, such as hiding income or falsifying information on a tax return. It is illegal and can result in fines or imprisonment.

Tax avoidance refers to the use of legal methods to reduce your tax bill, such as claiming allowable deductions or credits. It is legal as long as you follow the rules.

  1. Can you go to jail for not paying taxes if you can’t afford it?

Usually, you will not go to jail just because you can’t afford to pay your taxes. The IRS only sends people to jail if they purposely lie, hide money, or commit fraud. If you are honest and simply can’t pay, the IRS will work with you on payment plans or other options.

  1. How does the IRS investigate suspected tax evasion?

The IRS starts by reviewing your tax returns and financial records. They may look at bank statements, talk to your employer or bank, and ask for more documents. If they find signs of fraud, special agents may conduct further investigations, interview individuals, and even employ undercover methods. If they collect enough proof, your case can go to court.

  1. Does a tax evasion conviction affect your ability to travel or get a loan?

Yes, a conviction for tax evasion can make it more challenging to obtain a loan, as banks may view you as a higher risk. If you owe a lot in taxes, the IRS can also block or take away your passport, which can stop you from traveling internationally.

  1. What should I do if I’m being audited for suspected tax evasion?

Stay calm and respond to all IRS letters on time. Gather your records and be honest in your answers. It’s a good idea to contact a tax professional or attorney as soon as possible so you have someone experienced to guide you and protect your rights during the audit.

/by

ALL IRS AGENTS ARE NOT CREATED EQUALLY

 

BY: ANTHONY N. VERNI, ATTORNEY AT LAW, CPA

FEBRUARY 23, 2025

© 2025

ALL IRS AGENTS ARE NOT CREATED EQUALLY

THE IMPACT OF MENTAL ILLNESS, ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTION

The Internal Revenue Service would have you believe that every one of its employees is beyond reproach. In other words, every IRS Agent is free from mental illness, alcoholism or substance abuse as well as gambling addiction. They would also have you believe that each employee is competent, loves their job and has a genuine interest in assisting taxpayers in a manner that is consistent with the IRS Mission Statement.

Ask anyone who has ever encountered a belligerent IRS Agent during an audit or has been subject to aggressive collections tactics and they will validate the proposition that: “Not all IRS Agents are Created Equal.”

IRS employees, come in all shapes and sizes, and are no different than the taxpayers they oversea.  As such, among its ranks, there exist IRS agents who suffer from a variety of personal issues, which may impair their ability to carry out their duties in a professional manner.

The suggestion that all IRS employees are free from the effects of mental illness, alcoholism, substance abuse or gambling addiction, strongly suggests that the Agency lives in an alternate universe. Consequently, The IRS is likely to turn a blind eye when it comes to taxpayer complaints of aggressive and intimidating audit measures as well as “Mafia Style” collection practices.

Unfortunately, the taxpayers most likely to come into contact with these Agents are low income taxpayers, who are often times uneducated, struggle with the English language and lack the financial resources to take on an abusive IRS agent.

While the Internal Revenue Service will never concede the point, some of its Agents should not be working with the public.  Mental health professionals will tell you, that this type of behavior suggests a DSM V personality disorder, alcoholism, substance abuse or a gambling addiction.

While there are instances where an Agent is going through a rough patch due to divorce, illness or death in the family,  more often than not, abusive conduct and intimidating behavior suggests something far more  sinister,  likely attributable to mental illness, substance abuse, alcoholism or a problem with gambling.

The following discussion will examine the factors that can cause an IRS employee to deviate from standard IRS protocol and engage in abusive behavior as well as the Agent’s motivation for working for the Internal Revenue Service. We will also discuss which taxpayer group is more likely to come in contact with this type of IRS Employee. Finally we will examine specific criminal conduct on the part of IRS employees that supports the proposition that IRS employees are just likely to engage in bad behavior as a taxpayer.  It also is consistent with the notion that there are troubled players in every profession.

While the majority of IRS employees adhere to ethical standards and are well balanced, there are IRS Agents whose behavior underscores the necessity for continuous oversight and robust internal controls to prevent and address misconduct within the agency. Here are some key considerations:

  1. Decision-Making and Judgment-Substance abuse and mental illness can impair judgment and critical thinking, leading to inconsistent or overly aggressive audit practices. Agents struggling with addiction may exhibit mood swings, irrational decision-making or heightened stress responses.
  2. Increased Stress and Workplace Pressure-The IRS auditing environment is already high-pressure, with strict deadlines and quotas. Mental health struggles and addiction can exacerbate stress, making agents more likely to take out frustrations on taxpayers.
  3. Ethical and Legal Concerns-Addiction (especially gambling or financial struggles from substance abuse) may make some agents more susceptible to unethical behavior, including bias in auditing or even corruption. Alcohol or drug use on the job could also impair an agent’s ability to conduct fair audits, leading to excessive penalties or unnecessary scrutiny.
  4. Aggression and Workplace Behavior-Substance abuse can heighten aggression, making interactions between IRS agents and taxpayers more confrontational. Mental health issues like anxiety, depression, or PTSD can also manifest as irritability or hostility.
  5.  Working from Home: The long-term effects of working from home (WFH) have been extensively studied, revealing a complex list of challenges across productivity, well-being, and organizational dynamics.
  6. Productivity: Research indicates that the effect of WFH on productivity is not uniform. Studies have reported a range of outcomes, with productivity changes varying from a 19% decrease to a 13% increase. This variability is often attributed to differences in measurement methods and the nature of tasks across industries.
  7. Well-being and Mental Health: Social Isolation: Extended periods of remote work can lead to feelings of isolation and loneliness, potentially impacting mental health. A  December 2024 N.Y. Post Survey revealed that 25% of remote workers experienced a decline in social skills, particularly among millennials.
  8. Work-Life Balance: While WFH offers flexibility, it can also blur the boundaries between work and personal life, leading to overwork and stress. This imbalance may have long-term adverse effects on mental health if not managed properly.
  9. Organizational Dynamics: Agency Culture: Remote work can pose challenges to fostering and maintaining a cohesive Agency culture. The lack of in-person interactions may impede team-building efforts and the reinforcement of organizational values.
  10. Collaboration: The shift to remote work has altered collaboration patterns, with increases in virtual communications. However, the absence of face-to-face interactions can affect the quality of collaborative efforts and the building of trust among team members. The transition to remote work has introduced challenges related to supervision, impacting both managerial practices and employee experiences.
  11. Challenges of Remote Supervision: Reduced Face-to-Face Interaction: The absence of in-person oversight can make it difficult for supervisors to provide immediate feedback or support.
  12. Communication Barriers: Remote settings may hinder the transmission of nonverbal cues, essential for effective communication, potentially leading to misunderstandings and reduced managerial effectiveness.
  13. Impact on Employee Behavior and Performance: Decreased Engagement: Lack of interactive supervision can diminish employees’ self-efficacy, leading to reduced work engagement and increased likelihood of deviant behaviors.
  14. Proximity Bias: Remote employees may face disadvantages during downsizing or promotions due to a bias favoring in-office workers, affecting job security and career progression.
  15. Impact on Audit Outcomes-An Agent struggling with personal issues may either be excessively harsh or, conversely, overly lenient in their audits. Bias and emotional instability can lead to inconsistent enforcement of tax laws.

While the IRS has Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) to help agents manage addiction and mental health issues, employees are all too often reluctant to participate due to shame and the fear of being stigmatized. Having stated the obvious, why would anyone want to work for the IRS?

 WHY INDIVIDUALS SELECT THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AS A PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT

People may join the IRS for various reasons, including stability, benefits, and a genuine interest in tax law. However, there are also some unhealthy motivations that might drive certain individuals to work for the agency, including:

  1. Power and Control: Some individuals may be drawn to the IRS because they enjoy exerting authority over others, particularly in high-stakes financial situations. The ability to audit and penalize taxpayers can appeal to those with a controlling or authoritarian mindset.
  2. Personal Grievances and Resentment: People with a history of financial struggles, resentment toward the wealthy or personal tax issues may join the IRS as a way to “level the playing field” or take out frustrations on others. Some may see it as a way to enact revenge on a system they feel wronged by.
  3. Job Security Over Passion: Government jobs, including the IRS, offer stability, pensions, and benefits. Some individuals may take the job purely for security despite hating the work, leading to burnout, resentment, and toxic behavior.
  4. Enjoyment of Bureaucracy and Red Tape: Certain personality types thrive in bureaucratic environments where rules, regulations, and technicalities dictate outcomes. These individuals may take pleasure in making things difficult for others.
  5. Unresolved Psychological Issues: People with personal insecurities or struggles with authority may join as a way to feel important or gain validation. Those with aggressive tendencies may find satisfaction in enforcing rules with little room for flexibility.
  6. Financial Motivations (Unethical or Otherwise): Some individuals may seek IRS positions for insider knowledge on how to manipulate the tax system for personal gain. While corruption is rare, those with gambling or financial problems may be tempted to engage in unethical behavior.
  7. Lack of Other Career Options: Some join the IRS because they lack the qualifications or skills for other careers and settle for a government position that they don’t truly care about. This can result in poor work ethic, resentment toward taxpayers, and a general sense of dissatisfaction.

While many IRS employees are professionals dedicated to enforcing tax laws fairly, unhealthy motivations can lead to negative workplace cultures and poor treatment of taxpayers.   The following case illustrate that IRS employees are just as likely to suffer from emotional issues and addiction as any taxpayer.

CRIMINAL CASES INVLOLVING IRS EMPLOYEES

The IRS has been involved in numerous high-profile criminal cases, particularly through its Criminal Investigation (CI) Division, which investigates tax fraud, money laundering, and other financial crimes. In addition, prosecutions for other criminal acts also occur from time to time. Here are some notable examples:

  1. Convictions of IRS Agents for Corruption & Fraud: While the IRS investigates tax fraud, some of its own agents have also been caught in criminal activity:
  2. Willie G. Green (2022): Former IRS agent convicted for stealing taxpayer identities to file fraudulent tax returns.
  3. John Perry (2017): IRS agent sentenced for taking bribes to reduce taxpayer liabilities.
  4. Ndeye Amy Thioub (2024): Filing False Tax Returns. In March 2024, IRS revenue agent Ndeye Amy Thioub was arrested for allegedly filing false personal tax returns over three years. She was indicted on multiple counts, including filing false tax returns as an IRS employee. Thioub’s case highlights concerns about integrity within the agency.
  5. Sandra D. Mondaine (2024): Preparing Fraudulent Tax Returns. Former IRS employee Sandra D. Mondaine pleaded guilty in November 2024 to aiding in the preparation and filing of false tax returns. Mondaine assisted at least 11 individuals in filing 39 fraudulent returns between 2018 and 2021, resulting in a tax loss of approximately $237,329. Her actions violated the trust placed in IRS personnel.
  6. John Anthony Castro (2024): Tax Fraud Conviction. John Anthony Castro, a tax consultant and former IRS employee, was convicted in May 2024 on 33 counts of tax fraud. Castro’s scheme involved promising clients inflated tax refunds by fabricating deductions and then retaining a significant portion of the refunds. His fraudulent activities led to over $15.5 million in losses to the U.S. government.
  7. Widespread Tax Noncompliance among IRS Employees: Reports have also revealed that nearly 6,000 IRS employees, approximately 5% of the workforce, owed around $50 million in unpaid taxes as of August 2024. Despite their role in tax enforcement, many did not have repayment plans. Between October 2021 and April 2023, only 20 out of 139 employees caught cheating were terminated, raising concerns about internal accountability.

These cases underscore the importance of stringent oversight and ethical standards within the IRS to maintain public trust in the tax system.

IRS Complicit in Identity Theft and Refund Fraud: While the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is primarily tasked with combating identity theft and refund fraud, there have been instances where IRS employees have been implicated in such activities. Cases, though relatively rare, highlight vulnerabilities within the system. For illustration purposes, consider the following:

  1. Atlanta, Georgia (2018): An IRS employee pleaded guilty to aggravated identity theft for participating in a scheme that involved filing fraudulent tax returns using stolen identities. This insider access facilitated the theft of taxpayer information, leading to significant financial losses.
  2. Unnamed Former IRS Employee (2022): Tax Evasion. In July 2022, a former IRS employee was sentenced to 13 months in prison after pleading guilty to filing false tax returns and providing fabricated records to the IRS in an attempt to obstruct an audit of those returns. This case underscores that even those within the agency are not above the law.
  3. COVID-19 Relief Fraud Scheme (2023): In May 2023, six defendants, including a former IRS revenue officer and his brother, were sentenced to prison terms ranging from 12 to 30 months. They were convicted on charges of fraudulently obtaining millions of dollars in COVID-19 pandemic relief funds through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). This case highlights the involvement of an IRS insider in exploiting relief programs.

Domestic Violence: While instances of IRS agents being convicted specifically for domestic violence are rare, there have been notable cases:

  1. Robert Clarkson (2008): Criminal Domestic Violence Charges. Robert Barnwell Clarkson, a known tax protester and former IRS agent, was arrested in September 2008 in Anderson, South Carolina, along with his wife. Both were charged with criminal domestic violence. During a court hearing, Clarkson pleaded not guilty and claimed his wife had become addicted to drugs he had provided. He admitted to giving her cocaine to address her “chronic fatigue.” Subsequently, Clarkson faced additional charges, including violating a trespass order, unlawful use of the 911 emergency phone service, and first-degree harassment.
  2. Former IRS Agent Charged in 2023 Deaths: In 2023, a former IRS agent was charged in connection with the deaths of his wife and another man. While this case involves severe allegations of violence, it is essential to note that the individual was a former agent at the time of the incident

IRS Agents Convicted of Vehicular Manslaughter: While instances of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agents being convicted specifically for vehicular manslaughter are rare, there have been notable cases involving IRS employees in fatal incidents:

  1. James Farley (2023): Fatal Crash in Ohio. In March 2023, James Farley, a retired IRS agent, was involved in a fatal car accident in Ohio. Farley, driving a Bentley, rear-ended a Jeep driven by 22-year-old Samantha Nelson, causing the Jeep to roll over and resulting in Nelson’s death. Farley pleaded guilty to aggravated vehicular homicide, a third-degree felony, and was sentenced to 30 days in county jail, followed by three years of probation.
  2. Larry Edward Brown Jr. (2023): Shooting Incident in Arizona. In August 2023, Larry Edward Brown Jr., an IRS Special Agent, was involved in a shooting incident at a gun range in Phoenix, Arizona, resulting in the death of fellow agent Patrick Bauer. Brown was charged with involuntary manslaughter but was acquitted in February 2025. The incident occurred during a training exercise when Brown accidentally discharged his firearm, fatally wounding Bauer.

These cases highlight the serious consequences of negligent behavior, regardless of the individual’s profession.

IRS Agent Convicted of Drunk Driving: Jeremy Spencer (2022) – Fatal Crash in Texas. In 2022, Jeremy Spencer, an IRS employee, was involved in a fatal car accident in Collin County, Texas. Spencer was driving under the influence of alcohol when he crashed his vehicle, resulting in the death of his passenger. At the time of the crash, Spencer did not have an eligible driver’s license due to a previous DWI conviction. He was arrested and charged with intoxication manslaughter.

TAXPAYERS LIKELY TO INCUR THE WRATH OF IRS AGENTS

Low-income taxpayers frequently rely on straightforward tax forms and use tax credits and deductions designed to alleviate financial burdens, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). Any discrepancies or issues arising from these filings can attract the attention of the IRS, prompting audits and inquiries to ensure compliance with tax obligations.

In contrast, wealthy taxpayers and affluent corporations often engage in more complex financial dealings. These intricacies can include investments in international markets, real estate transactions, and sophisticated tax avoidance strategies. While these strategies can be legal, the law is often ambiguous, leaving room for interpretation. This ambiguity creates challenges for the IRS regarding the allocation of resources for enforcement. However, the wealthy taxpayer will almost always engage a competent and legitimate tax professional, such as an attorney or CPA, lending credence to the return. Moreover, the wealthy taxpayer is not afraid of the IRS and has the resources to do battle with them.

One of the most significant reasons the IRS focuses on low-income taxpayers lies in resource allocation. The IRS operates under a budget constrained by government appropriations. As a result, it must prioritize its audit and enforcement strategies to maximize efficiency and revenue generation.

Low-income taxpayers represent a lower risk in terms of audit complexity (“Low Hanging Fruit”). Auditing these individuals usually involves straightforward assessments regarding simple income and credit discrepancies. In particular, in the case of the fraudulent return preparer, who generally not a Circular 230 tax professional, will not respond to any adjustment to a client’s tax return for fear of being detected and investigated.

Consequently, the disallowance of a credit or deduction will, very rarely, result in the taxpayer opposing the IRS. In contrast, wealthy taxpayers involve more significant resource implications. Audits may necessitate extensive legal and financial expertise, along with resources that the agency does not always have at its disposal.

Focusing on lower-income brackets allows the IRS to close the tax gap, namely, the difference between taxes owed and taxes paid more efficiently. The perceived return on investment in auditing low-income taxpayers often appears more favorable compared to the lengthy and resource-intensive process required to audit wealthier individuals and corporations, whose tax strategies might involve aggressive planning and sophisticated loopholes.

Consequently, low income taxpayers are likely to encounter a troubled IRS Agent and may be subject to abusive behavior.

If you have been subjected to aggressive and unreasonable tactics on the part of an IRS agent, you should strongly consider retaining the services of a tax attorney, who often times can intervene causing the Agent to fall into line. In extreme cases, it may be wise to have an Attorney lobby for a change in Agents to handle your case.

The hope that the IRS has evolved to a point where its employees will have the courage and resolve to acknowledge their shortcomings and take steps to remedy unacceptable behavior is altruistic.  The Agency work environment is not conducive to open dialogue between employees and members of management.

If you have been subjected to abusive or aggressive behavior by an IRS agent, it would be wise to retain an experienced and knowledgeable tax attorney who could intervene on your behalf.  It is amazing to see what happens when an agent suddenly has to deal with a legal representative. In most cases, there is an immediate change in attitude. In cases, where the agent’s behavior does improve, there are remedies including contacting the territory manager and having the Agent replaced. In more severe cases, an Attorney can file a formal complaint.

 

/by